- SC : Circular on merchant-exporter's entitlement to duty-drawback explanatory, applies retrospectively; Overturns HC
- CESTAT : Citing unambiguous IGST-notification, rules on rate applicable on lithium-ion batteries imported by Samsung
- HC : Criticizing ‘needless’ litigation, grants compensation after customs eschews DGFT's classification
- HC : GST invoice without customs duty disclosure valid for claiming duty drawback
- SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP over duty-drawback eligibility on unlocked/activated mobile phones
Expert Column
![]() BEPS & GST - Eerie parallels, one curious questionSurya Prakash B.S., Chartered Accountant |
![]() CENVAT credit on capital goods - An unheeded disparity in Telecom IndustryRaghavan Ramabadran, Partner, Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan |
![]() Includibility of land value in works contract: A Pandora’s Box! – Part IIMalini Mallikarjun, Partner, BMR & Associates LLP |
![]() VAT on Construction Contracts - No curtain on controversyPrashant Deshpande, Senior Director, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India Pvt. Ltd. |
![]() Sec 67A vs Rule 4 of POT Rules : A question of supremacyK. Vaitheeswaran, Advocate & Tax Consultant |
- « first
- ‹ previous
- …
- 84
- 85
- …
- next ›
- last »